In an unexpected turn of events, Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele stands firm against returning a wrongfully deported man to the U.S., defying a Supreme Court order.
See the video below!
Their refusal highlights the tension in diplomatic relations and shines a spotlight on the limitations of judicial mandates.
President Nayib Bukele declared he would not bring back Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident mistakenly deported to El Salvador.
In a candid statement to reporters, Bukele was emphatic and unreserved, “Of course I’m not going to do it.”
Bukele’s stance contradicts the recent Supreme Court directive for the U.S. to facilitate Garcia’s return.
This situation has brought the issue of deportation agreements between the U.S. and El Salvador to the forefront.
During an Oval Office meeting with President Trump, both leaders claimed they lack the power to return Garcia to U.S. soil.
Trump aides, including Attorney General Pam Bondi and White House aide Stephen Miller, suggested the decision ultimately rests with El Salvador’s government.
This defiance of the Supreme Court’s ruling challenges the very notion of international cooperation and judicial enforcement.
Bukele referred to Garcia as a terrorist, justifying his reluctance to release him from El Salvadorean custody.
This accusation starkly contrasts with Garcia’s family’s assertions that he fled El Salvador to escape gang violence and has no ties to MS-13.
Bukele’s labeling of Garcia puts pressure on officials to reconsider the implications of such labels and how they affect diplomatic relations.
The Supreme Court’s order underscores the responsibilities of the U.S. government to ensure Garcia’s deportation was appropriately handled.
However, critics argue the Court’s decision may overreach and fail to consider El Salvador’s sovereignty and legal processes.
White House aide Stephen Miller emphasized that seeking Garcia’s return could be seen as overreach, akin to kidnapping.
This perspective resonates with those who prioritize national sovereignty and are wary of mandated interventions.
Meanwhile, Rep. Jamie Raskin urged compliance with the Court’s decision, highlighting the bilateral agreements on deportations.
Senators, including Chris Van Hollen, expressed concern, calling for discussions with Bukele to resolve this diplomatic challenge.
The path to resolution remains uncertain, with intensified debates over immigration policy and international law compliance.
COLLINS: Can President Bukele weigh in on this? Do you plan to return Garcia?
BUKELE: How can I smuggle a terrorist into the United States? Of course I'm not going to do it. The question is preposterous
TRUMP: These are sick people pic.twitter.com/y2FhtZsAhL
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) April 14, 2025
