
(ReclaimingAmerica.net) – Echoing the United States’ earlier move under President Trump, Argentina’s decision to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) has drawn attention and speculation worldwide.
Motivated by what they describe as “deep differences regarding health management,” Argentina’s stance resonates with many who question the legitimacy of global health governance.
President Javier Milei’s decision to withdraw from the WHO follows Trump’s path, signaling a divergence from traditional international alliances.
A spokesman for President Milei cited “Deep differences regarding health management, especially during the [COVID-19] pandemic,” pointing to issues of WHO’s management effectiveness and neutrality.
Moreover, concerns over perceived Chinese influence further fueled this decision, which aligns with Trump’s previous critiques of the WHO’s handling of global health policies.
Milei and Trump appear to admire each other, with Milei viewing Trump as an ally and Trump openly calling Milei “his favorite president.”
Such endorsement underlines the ideological alignment on issues of sovereignty and skepticism towards international organizations like the WHO.
🚨🇦🇷 MILEI TO EXIT W.H.O?!
Argentina may follow Trump’s lead and withdraw from the World Health Organization, citing concerns over inefficiency, sovereignty, and overreach.
Milei has been vocal about his opposition to globalism, calling for a break from international… https://t.co/60zjRa4uvr pic.twitter.com/zZz7BTDOt9
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) January 24, 2025
Argentinian media suggested President Milei will soon sign an executive order to initiate the withdrawal process.
This decision is supported by Milei’s vision to enhance national sovereignty and tailor Argentina’s health policies without external interference.
The government argued that leaving the WHO provides more flexibility in health policy and financial management, which is crucial for a country experiencing prolonged lockdowns under previous administrations.
Meanwhile, Argentina’s contribution to the WHO may be small compared to the U.S.’s, but its geopolitical implications are significant.
The withdrawal could inspire other nations to reassess their memberships in international bodies, challenging the established global order.
While Argentina’s direct financial impact on the WHO may be minimal, the symbolic gesture enforces a narrative that questions the organization’s credibility and independence.
“We will not allow an international organization to intervene in our sovereignty, much less in our health,” declared presidential spokesperson Manuel Adorni, emphasizing Argentina’s commitment to national autonomy.
Critics asserted that the WHO has led to unnecessary shutdowns during the pandemic, straining economies and societies without providing proportional benefits.
As Argentina looks to navigate its health and economic policies independently, speculation looms about whether this assertiveness might extend to other international agreements, such as the Paris Climate Accord.
The requirement for a 12-month notice and settlement of financial obligations provides a window for potential re-evaluation or negotiations.
Still, Milei’s firm stance appears unwavering as he strengthens local autonomy over foreign dependence.
As more nations consider following Argentina’s lead, the future of global health diplomacy hangs in the balance.
This bold move serves as a wake-up call to international organizations that have lost sight of their true purpose and become entangled in political agendas at the expense of national interests.
Copyright 2025, ReclaimingAmerica.net